Tag Archive | "islam"

Tags: , , ,

KJV-ers and the Quran

Posted on 26 October 2009 by Matt

The recent story of a KJV-only church burning non-KJV Bibles got me thinking about the three main views of how God inspired holy texts:

1. Islam. God spoke through his prophet Muhammad, in Arabic, and Muhammad transcribed God’s words—in Arabic. Translation of the Quran into other languages is discouraged, because the Quran is only considered truly inspired and reliable in Arabic.

2. KJV-Only. Numerous authors penned the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments in Greek and Hebrew. However, it was not until 1,500 years later that God miraculously enabled King James’ clerics to compile and translate manuscripts into an English Bible that is now the only truly inspired and inerrant version available.

3. Classical Evangelical. The Holy Spirit led authors to pen 66 books in Greek and Hebrew—the original manuscripts of which are inspired, inerrant and authoritative. We no longer have any of these original documents, but the thousands of copies of these manuscripts that we do have allow us to reliably translate God’s Word into any language on earth.

Now, which of these two views are most similar?

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments (3)

Tags: , ,

Where Are the Feminists?

Posted on 04 June 2009 by Matt

While there was much to like about President Obama’s speech to the “Muslim world”, it also revealed a stunning naivete in his understanding of the Islamic worldview. His predecessor George W. Bush incorrectly assumed that democracy could be planted and would take root anywhere in the world, once a tyrant was removed from power. After all, everyone believes in freedom, right? Similarily, Obama has flattened the drastic differences between the Muslim and the Western worldview–and even conflated the worldviews of Arabs and other Muslims, as though they are a monolithic people who merely need to be educated on how similar we all are. Nowhere is this simplemindedness more evident than in his comments on Islam and women. I would expect that feminists will have a response much more eloquent than mine, but here goes:

The U.S. government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.

Huh? Wearing a hijab is not a “right” in many parts of the Muslim world—it’s what women do to avoid being stoned. The real question is whether we support a man’s right to force his wife to wear a hijab.

I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal …

This is a straw man. I’m not aware of anyone in the “West” who thinks that someone with a head covering is less equal. This ideology is inherent in the teachings of the Qur’an. The head covering is a cultural/religious expression of a man’s ownership of his wife and the belief that she should be seen by no one but him.

… but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Bravo, Mr. President! This is true, but you’re building your argument on a presupposition that equality and prosperity are both positive ends–even when they may stand counter to one’s religious views. Westerners value prosperity over religious conformity. Be assured that this is a value that your audience does not share.

Now let me be clear: issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia, we have seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead. Meanwhile, the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.

It’s ludicrous to compare the plight of women who may face job discrimination in the America with women who aren’t allowed to have a job, drive a car, choose who they marry, have a say over how many children they may have or whether their husband takes additional wives. This is an insult to truly oppressed women.

Our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons, and our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity – men and women – to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice. That is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams.

Thanks, Joel Osteen–I mean, Mr. Obama. These platitudes only reinforce the inadequacy of political leaders to advance a truly effective solution to the clash of civilizations. The only real change will occur in the pockets where people of both Western and Islamic culture encounter and submit their worldviews to the radical demands of the Cross, which require that they love one another.

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments Off

Tags: , ,

I’m Sorry, Muslims

Posted on 05 December 2007 by Matt

After reading a recent letter from evangelicals to Muslims apologizing for the crusades, the war in Iraq and just about every offense in between, I feel that it is important (since I was not invited to sign the document) that I issue a formal apology as well.

No, I’m not Catholic. No, I can’t trace my lineage to Sir William Moorcrusher or any other 13th-century knight errant. No, I do not have a history of discriminating against followers of Muhammad in word, thought or deed. No, that was not me in the alley last night firing my AK47 in the air chanting, “Death to Saudi Arabia.”

You’re confused.

I’m just apologizing for the fact that stuff like that happened and that I share certain cultural characteristics with those who have participated in the above activities. The bottom line is that I’m just trying to cover my bases with a heavy dose of good, old-fashioned American penitence: the apology.

Ahh ….. Now that I have that off my chest, I await the response of conciliatory Muslims worldwide as they apologize for raiding Jerusalem and thereby initiating the crusades in the first place, for their imperialistic attempts to take over Europe from the 9th through the 15th century, for killing and torturing my Christian brothers and sisters in places like Sudan, Afghanistan and Indonesia, for … well, you get the picture.

How is my goofy little apology any more naive than that of a group of Western evangelicals, safely insulated from the bloody reality of the global Islamic-Christian conflict making an ad hoc statement of reconciliation with a bunch of moderate Muslim scholars, pasting it as an ad in The New York Times and then acting like they’ve accomplished something of significance? The conflict is not being fought at this level, so how can it be resolved at this level?

None of this means squat for the Arab warlord butchering the tribal Christian in Sudan or the Western missionary having an “interfaith dialogue” over Turkish coffee in a cafe in Amman. Yes, God is at work in the Muslim world, but His work is not that of reconciling Muslims to Christians or vice versa, but of reconciling Muslims to Himself through His Son.

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments Off

Tags: , ,

Reverse Contextualization?

Posted on 19 August 2007 by Matt

A Dutch Roman Catholic bishop is advocating the word “God” be replaced by “Allah” in order to generate greater acceptance and understanding among Muslims:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God,” he said. “Shouldn’t we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? What does God care what we call him? It is our problem.”

This is not a new idea. Since the word “God” in Arabic is “Allah”, Christians in Arabic-speaking contexts use the word in reference to the God of the Bible. Christian missionaries to Arabic-speaking countries have wrestled with the potential confusion of using the word “Allah” in communicating the gospel. But I don’t imagine Bishop Muskens is advocating this change to accommodate the ex-Muslim seekers flocking to his church.

He may be acting in ironic prescience, in light of the fact that, within the next 30 years, the Netherlands could be the second Muslim nation in Europe … behind France.

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments Off

Tags: , ,

Islam Will Fall

Posted on 07 October 2006 by Matt

The gospel will accomplish what guns and bombs never will.

Islam will fall. This is not the prediction of a diplomat with an ironclad peace treaty, a general with a superweapon … or even a hippy in his “herb garden.” This is the conviction of Brother Yun, a leader in the “underground” church in China living in exile in Western Europe. I recently had a chance to meet Yun and was humbled by the vision he shares with millions of Chinese Christians.

The Back to Jerusalem Vision, the movement Yun represents, is committed to taking the gospel across Asia to the heart of the Muslim world in order to complete the mandate of the Great Commission. Not willing to wait until the guns of the West convince radical Muslims that democracy and freedom are superior to oppression, many in the Chinese church believe that God has strategically chosen them to embrace a task that has befuddled Western missionaries for centuries.

Yun argues that a religion that offers its sons to die in fiery suicide bomb attacks will only be penetrated by a gospel whose adherents are more willing to die as martyrs at the hands of their persecutors than take up the sword in defense of their faith. Since 1949, when the Cultural Revolution began in China, Christians there have demonstrated their willingness to do so.

“Guns and bombs will not change the Muslim world, but the gospel will,” he explains. “Perhaps thousands of Chinese missionaries will die in the evangelization of the Muslim world.”

Lest you think Yun is merely another ivory-tower pacifist, I would encourage you to read his gripping autobiography, The Heavenly Man, in which he recounts his multiple imprisonments and horrific torture at the hands of the Chinese government. Yun is a man who has tasted violent persecution firsthand (e.g., He’s been electrocuted, beaten, had needles jammed under his fingernails …), and he has also seen miraculous intervention–one time walking out of a maximum security prison in full view of the guards (a la Peter, Acts 12), who looked through him, as if he weren’t there.

The Back to Jerusalem vision could be a rude awakening for the Western church, which has sometimes assumed the task of the Great Commission single handedly and relied on its satellite broadcasts, Bible translations and tent crusades to get the job done. We can learn from the radical commitment of our Chinese brothers and sisters as they redefine missiology in the 21st century. .

by Matt Green
from The Ministry Report
October 7, 2006

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments Off

Flickr Photos

See all photos

Connect

RSS feed

Facebook profile

LinkedIn profile

Follow on Twitter